Right, then. So you've made your mind up that this is all a very silly idea and it couldn't ever work.

Before retreating into your cosy shell of knowing for certain everything there is to know and dismissing this as a loony crackpot perpetual motion machine, make sure that you know exactly at which point you give up. I mean which specific point.

From every response I've had to this proposal (bar two) it has been transparently obvious to me that the critic hasn't read and understood what has been written. If you want to explain to me why it's nonsense then please do me the courtesy of actually doing just that, stating the exact technical detail which to your mind is at fault. I make no claims of free energy; this machine will burn string, need constant servicing and refuelling. If you are unsure about any of these points then you have no basis for reasoned argument; and you'll also need to try to find a flaw with this: diamagnetic water-strings. - and this: water strings.

now if you want to get really angry...

You might enjoy the pictures, even if you think the rest is daft. prefer some surrealism? (long wait).

And if you get really really angry you might even mail me: (like this chap did):

"As a member of the IEEE, I must admit that I am dubious of the application of sonoluminescence in laser development. If you did not present yourself as a crackpot in your e-mails and your website, perhaps you would not get a such uniform response those you contact. Sir, you're writing the webmaster of a site that documents urban games about a fairly esoteric discipline within physics, which leads me to think you're fairly desperate to have anyone listen to you. Please do not respond or contact me again about anything." Hugh McNally - some sort of expert on something or other. Righto, mate!